All posts
The role of self-awareness in managing our extreme tendencies
Author
Nilima Ajaikumar
Created on
January 17, 2025

As humans, one of our biggest challenges lies in our inability to assess ourselves objectively. The benefits associated with possessing self-awareness are well documented. Those who demonstrate a strong sense of self are regarded as higher performers, have better chances of getting promoted, improve job satisfaction and productivity amongst direct reports and tend to be better at decision making. Yet studies show that most people, across cultures, overestimate their competency across nearly all skills and attributes. 

Gaps in self-awareness lead to otherwise talented individuals to make mistakes, underperform or completely derail. Researchers observe that unconscious behavioral patterns of individuals have contributed to disrupting teams, companies and even countries. Overconfidence is an example of one such pattern that has shown to contribute to significant underrepresentation of women in leadership roles, decline in job performance and even driven catastrophic military decisions that cost millions of lives. 

Why is it then that otherwise competent individuals behave in seemingly irrational and self-detrimental ways?

Extreme traits could be associated with positive outcomes.

Individuals who have psychopathic tendencies are found in higher ranks of corporations more often than would be expected by chance. These leaders are considered creative, strategic thinkers with strong communication skills. That said, they score negatively in their competence in management, teamwork and overall achievement. In a similar vein, studies show that narcissistic CEOs are more inclined to be entrepreneurial and attract greater company valuations than those led by more modest leaders.

When demonstrated in excess, positive traits have negative effects. 

Conscientious leaders are valued in the workplace for their reliable, rule-abiding, organized nature. Yet taking these to an extreme could result in being associated with the tendency to be over-critical and micromanaging. There is growing research on the curvilinear relationship of all personality traits, that is, performance declines at the upper and lower extremes. Aristotle summed it up well when he noted that “every virtue is a mean between two extremes, each of which is a vice.” In many contexts, particularly leadership roles, moderate tendencies are preferred, as these individuals are less likely to be disruptive. 

Social contexts typically require keeping a rein on one’s impulses but when guards are down, behavior could become unrestrained.

Respectful work and social situations usually necessitate certain restraints. However, when tired, angry, upset or simply past the point of being concerned, individuals can become uninhibited and disruptive.For example, under stress, driven individuals can appear domineering, pushy and insensitive to those around them. Those who are flexible tend to be perceived as disorganized. And curious individuals can appear as idealistic or eccentric. These situations could lead to regretful decisions, damaged relationships and potentially take a toll on one’s reputation.

Behavior is contextual and environmental factors can promote extreme behavior.

Moving up seniority levels grant leaders greater influence over decision and delegation rights. Moreover, the positional power that comes with higher rank often cautions direct reports to censor their true viewpoints and act in more compliant ways than is true to their nature. Several researchers observe that power and control tend to dilute inhibition, making allowances for displays of unpleasant behaviors of power and even abusive control. If continually exposed to such extreme temperaments, we can expect individuals to have impaired decision making skills and become unable to collaborate with their colleagues – ultimately taking a toll on individual, team and organizational performance. The damage brought about  by toxic leaders can be far-reaching within the individuals and culture of an organization.

When reflecting on what it takes to succeed, it is important to empower oneself through self-awareness. Extreme tendencies are not necessarily barriers to success. It is often our strengths, left unchecked or taken to an extreme that present themselves as risks. These have the potential to obscure us from being cognizant of the consequences of our actions. Shedding light on our unique tendencies and building a strong sense of self can be pivotal to our careers, teams, organizations and communities.



Recent posts
Articles
Bridging the gap: from assessments to soft skill development
Without clear steps forward, valuable data goes unused, and development stalls. Turning assessment results into personalized growth pathways is critical to empower individuals and strengthen organizations.
Read more
Articles
How who you are shapes how you work
Discover how your personality fuels your soft skills at work. Collaboration, adaptability, leadership, and other soft skills all start with who you truly are. Read more in the blog.
Read more
Articles
When opposites attract: Turning personality differences into workplace strengths
Contrasting personalities can transform differences into powerful workplace strengths. Learn about personality compatibility at the workplace in this blog.
Read more
Articles
Soft Skills Intelligence: From personality to performance
Discover the science behind Soft Skills Intelligence and how it transforms personality and values into measurable, actionable insights.
Read more
Articles
Onboarding with intent: The impact of thoughtful approaches on organizational success
Onboarding is more than a checklist. It's an opportunity to tailor experiences, foster engagement, and set new hires up for long-term success. Read more in this blog.
Read more
All posts
The role of self-awareness in managing our extreme tendencies
Author
Nilima Ajaikumar
Created on

As humans, one of our biggest challenges lies in our inability to assess ourselves objectively. The benefits associated with possessing self-awareness are well documented. Those who demonstrate a strong sense of self are regarded as higher performers, have better chances of getting promoted, improve job satisfaction and productivity amongst direct reports and tend to be better at decision making. Yet studies show that most people, across cultures, overestimate their competency across nearly all skills and attributes. 

Gaps in self-awareness lead to otherwise talented individuals to make mistakes, underperform or completely derail. Researchers observe that unconscious behavioral patterns of individuals have contributed to disrupting teams, companies and even countries. Overconfidence is an example of one such pattern that has shown to contribute to significant underrepresentation of women in leadership roles, decline in job performance and even driven catastrophic military decisions that cost millions of lives. 

Why is it then that otherwise competent individuals behave in seemingly irrational and self-detrimental ways?

Extreme traits could be associated with positive outcomes.

Individuals who have psychopathic tendencies are found in higher ranks of corporations more often than would be expected by chance. These leaders are considered creative, strategic thinkers with strong communication skills. That said, they score negatively in their competence in management, teamwork and overall achievement. In a similar vein, studies show that narcissistic CEOs are more inclined to be entrepreneurial and attract greater company valuations than those led by more modest leaders.

When demonstrated in excess, positive traits have negative effects. 

Conscientious leaders are valued in the workplace for their reliable, rule-abiding, organized nature. Yet taking these to an extreme could result in being associated with the tendency to be over-critical and micromanaging. There is growing research on the curvilinear relationship of all personality traits, that is, performance declines at the upper and lower extremes. Aristotle summed it up well when he noted that “every virtue is a mean between two extremes, each of which is a vice.” In many contexts, particularly leadership roles, moderate tendencies are preferred, as these individuals are less likely to be disruptive. 

Social contexts typically require keeping a rein on one’s impulses but when guards are down, behavior could become unrestrained.

Respectful work and social situations usually necessitate certain restraints. However, when tired, angry, upset or simply past the point of being concerned, individuals can become uninhibited and disruptive.For example, under stress, driven individuals can appear domineering, pushy and insensitive to those around them. Those who are flexible tend to be perceived as disorganized. And curious individuals can appear as idealistic or eccentric. These situations could lead to regretful decisions, damaged relationships and potentially take a toll on one’s reputation.

Behavior is contextual and environmental factors can promote extreme behavior.

Moving up seniority levels grant leaders greater influence over decision and delegation rights. Moreover, the positional power that comes with higher rank often cautions direct reports to censor their true viewpoints and act in more compliant ways than is true to their nature. Several researchers observe that power and control tend to dilute inhibition, making allowances for displays of unpleasant behaviors of power and even abusive control. If continually exposed to such extreme temperaments, we can expect individuals to have impaired decision making skills and become unable to collaborate with their colleagues – ultimately taking a toll on individual, team and organizational performance. The damage brought about  by toxic leaders can be far-reaching within the individuals and culture of an organization.

When reflecting on what it takes to succeed, it is important to empower oneself through self-awareness. Extreme tendencies are not necessarily barriers to success. It is often our strengths, left unchecked or taken to an extreme that present themselves as risks. These have the potential to obscure us from being cognizant of the consequences of our actions. Shedding light on our unique tendencies and building a strong sense of self can be pivotal to our careers, teams, organizations and communities.



Recent posts
Articles
Bridging the gap: from assessments to soft skill development
Without clear steps forward, valuable data goes unused, and development stalls. Turning assessment results into personalized growth pathways is critical to empower individuals and strengthen organizations.
Read more
Articles
How who you are shapes how you work
Discover how your personality fuels your soft skills at work. Collaboration, adaptability, leadership, and other soft skills all start with who you truly are. Read more in the blog.
Read more
Articles
When opposites attract: Turning personality differences into workplace strengths
Contrasting personalities can transform differences into powerful workplace strengths. Learn about personality compatibility at the workplace in this blog.
Read more
Articles
Soft Skills Intelligence: From personality to performance
Discover the science behind Soft Skills Intelligence and how it transforms personality and values into measurable, actionable insights.
Read more
Articles
Onboarding with intent: The impact of thoughtful approaches on organizational success
Onboarding is more than a checklist. It's an opportunity to tailor experiences, foster engagement, and set new hires up for long-term success. Read more in this blog.
Read more
All posts
The role of self-awareness in managing our extreme tendencies
Author
Nilima Ajaikumar
Created on
January 17, 2025

As humans, one of our biggest challenges lies in our inability to assess ourselves objectively. The benefits associated with possessing self-awareness are well documented. Those who demonstrate a strong sense of self are regarded as higher performers, have better chances of getting promoted, improve job satisfaction and productivity amongst direct reports and tend to be better at decision making. Yet studies show that most people, across cultures, overestimate their competency across nearly all skills and attributes. 

Gaps in self-awareness lead to otherwise talented individuals to make mistakes, underperform or completely derail. Researchers observe that unconscious behavioral patterns of individuals have contributed to disrupting teams, companies and even countries. Overconfidence is an example of one such pattern that has shown to contribute to significant underrepresentation of women in leadership roles, decline in job performance and even driven catastrophic military decisions that cost millions of lives. 

Why is it then that otherwise competent individuals behave in seemingly irrational and self-detrimental ways?

Extreme traits could be associated with positive outcomes.

Individuals who have psychopathic tendencies are found in higher ranks of corporations more often than would be expected by chance. These leaders are considered creative, strategic thinkers with strong communication skills. That said, they score negatively in their competence in management, teamwork and overall achievement. In a similar vein, studies show that narcissistic CEOs are more inclined to be entrepreneurial and attract greater company valuations than those led by more modest leaders.

When demonstrated in excess, positive traits have negative effects. 

Conscientious leaders are valued in the workplace for their reliable, rule-abiding, organized nature. Yet taking these to an extreme could result in being associated with the tendency to be over-critical and micromanaging. There is growing research on the curvilinear relationship of all personality traits, that is, performance declines at the upper and lower extremes. Aristotle summed it up well when he noted that “every virtue is a mean between two extremes, each of which is a vice.” In many contexts, particularly leadership roles, moderate tendencies are preferred, as these individuals are less likely to be disruptive. 

Social contexts typically require keeping a rein on one’s impulses but when guards are down, behavior could become unrestrained.

Respectful work and social situations usually necessitate certain restraints. However, when tired, angry, upset or simply past the point of being concerned, individuals can become uninhibited and disruptive.For example, under stress, driven individuals can appear domineering, pushy and insensitive to those around them. Those who are flexible tend to be perceived as disorganized. And curious individuals can appear as idealistic or eccentric. These situations could lead to regretful decisions, damaged relationships and potentially take a toll on one’s reputation.

Behavior is contextual and environmental factors can promote extreme behavior.

Moving up seniority levels grant leaders greater influence over decision and delegation rights. Moreover, the positional power that comes with higher rank often cautions direct reports to censor their true viewpoints and act in more compliant ways than is true to their nature. Several researchers observe that power and control tend to dilute inhibition, making allowances for displays of unpleasant behaviors of power and even abusive control. If continually exposed to such extreme temperaments, we can expect individuals to have impaired decision making skills and become unable to collaborate with their colleagues – ultimately taking a toll on individual, team and organizational performance. The damage brought about  by toxic leaders can be far-reaching within the individuals and culture of an organization.

When reflecting on what it takes to succeed, it is important to empower oneself through self-awareness. Extreme tendencies are not necessarily barriers to success. It is often our strengths, left unchecked or taken to an extreme that present themselves as risks. These have the potential to obscure us from being cognizant of the consequences of our actions. Shedding light on our unique tendencies and building a strong sense of self can be pivotal to our careers, teams, organizations and communities.



Recent posts
Articles
Bridging the gap: from assessments to soft skill development
Without clear steps forward, valuable data goes unused, and development stalls. Turning assessment results into personalized growth pathways is critical to empower individuals and strengthen organizations.
Read more
Articles
How who you are shapes how you work
Discover how your personality fuels your soft skills at work. Collaboration, adaptability, leadership, and other soft skills all start with who you truly are. Read more in the blog.
Read more
Articles
When opposites attract: Turning personality differences into workplace strengths
Contrasting personalities can transform differences into powerful workplace strengths. Learn about personality compatibility at the workplace in this blog.
Read more
Articles
Soft Skills Intelligence: From personality to performance
Discover the science behind Soft Skills Intelligence and how it transforms personality and values into measurable, actionable insights.
Read more
Articles
Onboarding with intent: The impact of thoughtful approaches on organizational success
Onboarding is more than a checklist. It's an opportunity to tailor experiences, foster engagement, and set new hires up for long-term success. Read more in this blog.
Read more
All posts
The role of self-awareness in managing our extreme tendencies
Author
Nilima Ajaikumar
Created on
January 17, 2025

As humans, one of our biggest challenges lies in our inability to assess ourselves objectively. The benefits associated with possessing self-awareness are well documented. Those who demonstrate a strong sense of self are regarded as higher performers, have better chances of getting promoted, improve job satisfaction and productivity amongst direct reports and tend to be better at decision making. Yet studies show that most people, across cultures, overestimate their competency across nearly all skills and attributes. 

Gaps in self-awareness lead to otherwise talented individuals to make mistakes, underperform or completely derail. Researchers observe that unconscious behavioral patterns of individuals have contributed to disrupting teams, companies and even countries. Overconfidence is an example of one such pattern that has shown to contribute to significant underrepresentation of women in leadership roles, decline in job performance and even driven catastrophic military decisions that cost millions of lives. 

Why is it then that otherwise competent individuals behave in seemingly irrational and self-detrimental ways?

Extreme traits could be associated with positive outcomes.

Individuals who have psychopathic tendencies are found in higher ranks of corporations more often than would be expected by chance. These leaders are considered creative, strategic thinkers with strong communication skills. That said, they score negatively in their competence in management, teamwork and overall achievement. In a similar vein, studies show that narcissistic CEOs are more inclined to be entrepreneurial and attract greater company valuations than those led by more modest leaders.

When demonstrated in excess, positive traits have negative effects. 

Conscientious leaders are valued in the workplace for their reliable, rule-abiding, organized nature. Yet taking these to an extreme could result in being associated with the tendency to be over-critical and micromanaging. There is growing research on the curvilinear relationship of all personality traits, that is, performance declines at the upper and lower extremes. Aristotle summed it up well when he noted that “every virtue is a mean between two extremes, each of which is a vice.” In many contexts, particularly leadership roles, moderate tendencies are preferred, as these individuals are less likely to be disruptive. 

Social contexts typically require keeping a rein on one’s impulses but when guards are down, behavior could become unrestrained.

Respectful work and social situations usually necessitate certain restraints. However, when tired, angry, upset or simply past the point of being concerned, individuals can become uninhibited and disruptive.For example, under stress, driven individuals can appear domineering, pushy and insensitive to those around them. Those who are flexible tend to be perceived as disorganized. And curious individuals can appear as idealistic or eccentric. These situations could lead to regretful decisions, damaged relationships and potentially take a toll on one’s reputation.

Behavior is contextual and environmental factors can promote extreme behavior.

Moving up seniority levels grant leaders greater influence over decision and delegation rights. Moreover, the positional power that comes with higher rank often cautions direct reports to censor their true viewpoints and act in more compliant ways than is true to their nature. Several researchers observe that power and control tend to dilute inhibition, making allowances for displays of unpleasant behaviors of power and even abusive control. If continually exposed to such extreme temperaments, we can expect individuals to have impaired decision making skills and become unable to collaborate with their colleagues – ultimately taking a toll on individual, team and organizational performance. The damage brought about  by toxic leaders can be far-reaching within the individuals and culture of an organization.

When reflecting on what it takes to succeed, it is important to empower oneself through self-awareness. Extreme tendencies are not necessarily barriers to success. It is often our strengths, left unchecked or taken to an extreme that present themselves as risks. These have the potential to obscure us from being cognizant of the consequences of our actions. Shedding light on our unique tendencies and building a strong sense of self can be pivotal to our careers, teams, organizations and communities.



Recent posts
Articles
Bridging the gap: from assessments to soft skill development
Without clear steps forward, valuable data goes unused, and development stalls. Turning assessment results into personalized growth pathways is critical to empower individuals and strengthen organizations.
Read more
Articles
How who you are shapes how you work
Discover how your personality fuels your soft skills at work. Collaboration, adaptability, leadership, and other soft skills all start with who you truly are. Read more in the blog.
Read more
Articles
When opposites attract: Turning personality differences into workplace strengths
Contrasting personalities can transform differences into powerful workplace strengths. Learn about personality compatibility at the workplace in this blog.
Read more
Articles
Soft Skills Intelligence: From personality to performance
Discover the science behind Soft Skills Intelligence and how it transforms personality and values into measurable, actionable insights.
Read more
Articles
Onboarding with intent: The impact of thoughtful approaches on organizational success
Onboarding is more than a checklist. It's an opportunity to tailor experiences, foster engagement, and set new hires up for long-term success. Read more in this blog.
Read more
All posts
The role of self-awareness in managing our extreme tendencies
Customer
Job Title

As humans, one of our biggest challenges lies in our inability to assess ourselves objectively. The benefits associated with possessing self-awareness are well documented. Those who demonstrate a strong sense of self are regarded as higher performers, have better chances of getting promoted, improve job satisfaction and productivity amongst direct reports and tend to be better at decision making. Yet studies show that most people, across cultures, overestimate their competency across nearly all skills and attributes. 

Gaps in self-awareness lead to otherwise talented individuals to make mistakes, underperform or completely derail. Researchers observe that unconscious behavioral patterns of individuals have contributed to disrupting teams, companies and even countries. Overconfidence is an example of one such pattern that has shown to contribute to significant underrepresentation of women in leadership roles, decline in job performance and even driven catastrophic military decisions that cost millions of lives. 

Why is it then that otherwise competent individuals behave in seemingly irrational and self-detrimental ways?

Extreme traits could be associated with positive outcomes.

Individuals who have psychopathic tendencies are found in higher ranks of corporations more often than would be expected by chance. These leaders are considered creative, strategic thinkers with strong communication skills. That said, they score negatively in their competence in management, teamwork and overall achievement. In a similar vein, studies show that narcissistic CEOs are more inclined to be entrepreneurial and attract greater company valuations than those led by more modest leaders.

When demonstrated in excess, positive traits have negative effects. 

Conscientious leaders are valued in the workplace for their reliable, rule-abiding, organized nature. Yet taking these to an extreme could result in being associated with the tendency to be over-critical and micromanaging. There is growing research on the curvilinear relationship of all personality traits, that is, performance declines at the upper and lower extremes. Aristotle summed it up well when he noted that “every virtue is a mean between two extremes, each of which is a vice.” In many contexts, particularly leadership roles, moderate tendencies are preferred, as these individuals are less likely to be disruptive. 

Social contexts typically require keeping a rein on one’s impulses but when guards are down, behavior could become unrestrained.

Respectful work and social situations usually necessitate certain restraints. However, when tired, angry, upset or simply past the point of being concerned, individuals can become uninhibited and disruptive.For example, under stress, driven individuals can appear domineering, pushy and insensitive to those around them. Those who are flexible tend to be perceived as disorganized. And curious individuals can appear as idealistic or eccentric. These situations could lead to regretful decisions, damaged relationships and potentially take a toll on one’s reputation.

Behavior is contextual and environmental factors can promote extreme behavior.

Moving up seniority levels grant leaders greater influence over decision and delegation rights. Moreover, the positional power that comes with higher rank often cautions direct reports to censor their true viewpoints and act in more compliant ways than is true to their nature. Several researchers observe that power and control tend to dilute inhibition, making allowances for displays of unpleasant behaviors of power and even abusive control. If continually exposed to such extreme temperaments, we can expect individuals to have impaired decision making skills and become unable to collaborate with their colleagues – ultimately taking a toll on individual, team and organizational performance. The damage brought about  by toxic leaders can be far-reaching within the individuals and culture of an organization.

When reflecting on what it takes to succeed, it is important to empower oneself through self-awareness. Extreme tendencies are not necessarily barriers to success. It is often our strengths, left unchecked or taken to an extreme that present themselves as risks. These have the potential to obscure us from being cognizant of the consequences of our actions. Shedding light on our unique tendencies and building a strong sense of self can be pivotal to our careers, teams, organizations and communities.



Ready for your Spotlight?
Contact us to book your Customer Spotlight and showcase your work to an extensive, global audience!
Start your free trial today
Free access to Deeper Signals’ quick, scientific assessments, feedback tools, and more.
Start Free Trial
Recent posts
Articles
Bridging the gap: from assessments to soft skill development
Without clear steps forward, valuable data goes unused, and development stalls. Turning assessment results into personalized growth pathways is critical to empower individuals and strengthen organizations.
Read more
Articles
How who you are shapes how you work
Discover how your personality fuels your soft skills at work. Collaboration, adaptability, leadership, and other soft skills all start with who you truly are. Read more in the blog.
Read more
Articles
When opposites attract: Turning personality differences into workplace strengths
Contrasting personalities can transform differences into powerful workplace strengths. Learn about personality compatibility at the workplace in this blog.
Read more
Articles
Soft Skills Intelligence: From personality to performance
Discover the science behind Soft Skills Intelligence and how it transforms personality and values into measurable, actionable insights.
Read more
Articles
Onboarding with intent: The impact of thoughtful approaches on organizational success
Onboarding is more than a checklist. It's an opportunity to tailor experiences, foster engagement, and set new hires up for long-term success. Read more in this blog.
Read more
Curious to learn more?

Schedule a call with Deeper Signals to understand how our assessments and feedback tools help people gain a deep awareness of their talents and reach their full potential. Underpinned by science and technology, we build talented people, leaders and companies.

  • Scalable and engaging assessment solutions
  • Measurable and predictive talent insights
  • Powered by technology and science that drives results
Let's talk!
  • Scalable interventions for growth
  • Measureable data, insights and outcomes for high performance
  • Proven scientific expertise that links results to outcomes
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Please fill all fields before submiting the form.
Sign up
Want to be the first to know?
Thank you, we will be in touch soon!‍
Please fill all fields before submiting the form.